Medical Device

Medical Device Complaint Packaging & Analysis

Assesses the complainant's reported issue and the technician's resolution together against the manufacturer's complaint criteria and cites the evidence behind each finding.

Overview

Not every reported issue turns out to be a complaint. The Medical Device Complaint Packaging and Analysis Agent assesses the complainant's original report and the technician's resolution together once both are finalized, testing the combined record against the manufacturer's configured complaint criteria. Some cases clear the bar; some don't. What looked like a serious event at intake sometimes resolves as routine, non-reportable maintenance. Either way, the finding is cited to specific evidence. The determination stays with Quality, who sees every case; what changes is how prepared the record is when it reaches them.

Capabilities

Assemble intake and resolution into a single structured package

Combines the complainant's report and the technician's resolution into one record organized for Quality review.

Assess the package against ISO 13485 complaint criteria

Tests the combined record against the manufacturer's configured complaint-handling rubric across all required dimensions.

Cite the evidence behind each finding

Every finding ties back to a customer quote, technician note, or confirmed Pathways reference. Nothing is asserted without a source.

Separate routine maintenance from complaint-reportable findings

Cases that resolve as non-reportable maintenance are distinguished from those that meet the complaint bar. The determination stays with Quality.

Example use case

User input

SR-2026-100442 ready for complaint assessment. Intake and resolution both complete.

Agent summary

Input identified
SR-2026-100442. MD987. Full package assembled.
Context captured
ISO 13485 criteria applied. Intake and resolution records both present and linked.
Evidence surfaced
  • Patient exposure: confirmed — patient connected during event
  • Malfunction during use: confirmed — abnormal behavior reported by clinical staff
  • Serious injury potential: requires Quality determination — smoke and odor reported, eye irritation noted
  • Resolution documentation: complete — root cause confirmed, corrective action taken, return-to-service verified

Flagged by agent

Event meets complaint threshold. Smoke reported during active patient procedure. Eye irritation reported post-event. Quality determination required.

Agent handoff

Quality review package ready:

  • Complaint determination: meets criteria — Quality to confirm reportability
  • Evidence cited to customer verbatim, technician notes, and Pathways reference
  • Package organized for regulatory review

Agent workflow 

1. Intake and resolution records arrive complete

Both have already been checked by the intake and resolution compliance agents.

2. Combined package assessed against the configured complaint criteria

The intake and resolution records are tested against the manufacturer's complaint-handling rubric.

3. Narratives compared and evidence cited

Each finding ties back to a customer quote, technician note, or confirmed Pathways reference.

4. Agent prepares the analysis package

The contents are organized for Quality review with findings, evidence, and open questions clearly separated.

5. Package surfaced to Quality with determination and cited evidence

Quality reviews a prepared record with the complaint assessment already complete. The determination is theirs; the preparation is the agent's.

Explore more resources